Chess or Checkers

Sorry for back to back posts from email newsletters – but this was too good to not pass along.  It’s from the Marcus Buckingham Company April newsletter.  Marcus co-authored Now Discover Your Strengths, a must read if you are not familiar with Strengthsfinder.  He also wrote First Break all the Rules which provides great insight into the difference between great leaders and great managers.  This metaphor is simple and powerful.

“The best boss I ever had.” That’s a phrase that most of us have said or heard at some point, but what does it mean? What sets the great boss apart from the average boss? What do great managers actually do?

While there are as many styles of management as there are managers, there is one quality that sets truly great managers apart from the rest: They discover what is unique about each person and then make the most of it. To simplify, average managers play checkers, while great managers play chess.

The difference? In checkers, all the pieces are uniform and move in the same way; they are interchangeable. You need to plan and coordinate their movements, certainly, but they all move at the same pace, on parallel paths. In chess, each piece moves in a different way, and you can’t play if you don’t know how each piece moves. More important, you won’t win if you don’t think carefully about how you move the pieces. Great managers know and value the unique abilities and even the eccentricities of their employees, and they learn how best to integrate them into a coordinated plan of attack.

This is the exact opposite of what great leaders do. Great leaders discover what is universal and capitalize on it. A leader’s job is to rally people toward a better future. He can succeed in this only when he can cut through differences of race, sex, age, nationality, and personality and, using stories and celebrating heroes, tap into those very few needs we all share.

The job of a manager, on the other hand, is to turn one person’s particular talent into performance. A manager will succeed only when he can identify and deploy the differences among people, challenging each employee to excel in his own way. This doesn’t mean a leader can’t be a manager or vice versa. But to excel at one or both, you must be aware of the very different skills each role requires.

What do you think – are you better at chess or checkers?

In case you don’t know me, I’m a chess player, without a doubt.

Successful People are Annoying

Patrick Lencioni is the author of some of my favorite books on leadership and organization.  He sends a monthly email called Pat’s POV -it’s worth subscribing too.  The following is from April:

A friend of mine (I’ll call him Al because that’s his name) recently embarked on a new career as a consultant, and he has been wildly successful, even during these difficult economic times. Anyone who knows him will tell you why he has done so well: he is one of the most diligent, enthusiastic and painstakingly thorough people you’ll ever meet. In fact, if you were a competitor of his, you’d say he is over the top. Even annoying.

Anyone who is being honest with himself will admit that the only reason to be annoyed by Al is because he is setting the bar high for himself and his competitors, and because he is able to leap over that bar every time. His success makes perfect sense.

A client organization I’ve worked with a lot over the past few years, Chick-fil-A, shares many of Al’s characteristics. The Atlanta-based restaurant company is known for extraordinary service and customer loyalty, as well as strong financial performance. Anyone who has worked with them behind the scenes knows why — they are extremely picky about everything they do. They approach every project they engage in, from new product launches to leadership training, with extraordinary attention to detail. And they never, ever do something halfway. They take time to do research, think through their options, and carefully discern what would be best for their customers and employees. And then they do it again.

I will be honest here and tell you that even as a partner and vendor to Chick-fil-A, there was a time early in our relationship when I thought my friends there were a little over the top. In the process of doing a project, I’d be tempted to say, “Come on now. That’s good enough. Let’s not overdo this.” And then I would see the end product of their diligence, whether it was a management training program or the opening of a new store or a new menu item, and I would think oh, now I get it. Again, their success makes perfect sense.

Any competitor of Chick-fil-A who finds them annoying, and many of them certainly do, would have to admit that it’s just plain hard to compete with an organization that sets the bar so high and clears it again and again. Of course, customers don’t find Chick-fil-A annoying; they love the consistency of their service and products. And employees don’t seem to mind it either; the line of people who want to work there is a long one.

All of this says something interesting about success. If you’re not willing to do things that others would say are over the top, and if you’re not comfortable being criticized for being annoying and for having standards that seem perhaps just a little too high, then you’ll drift toward mediocrity. And though no one would ever aspire to being mediocre, it is more tempting than we might realize.After all, the majority of people out there will encourage us to take the easy route, because that isn’t threatening to them. They’ll support us as we justify cutting a corner here and lowering our standards there, because it isn’t reasonable to do anything more.

And I suppose that’s the whole point. Success isn’t about being reasonable. It’s demanding. It’s over the top. It can even be annoying. But it’s worth it.

Reading it I realize I’m more often annoyed than I’m annoying.  I’d rather it be the other way around.

Big Vision and the Big Ask

I spent the last two days in Stockholm at a church planting conference.    The organizers have a vision to start 50 churches in Stockholm by 2020.  They modeled some great things leaders can learn from.

1. If people don’t laugh your vision is too small.

In the U.S. planting 50 churches in 10 years is a big goal, but there are plenty of organizations who will do just that and more.  In Stockholm church attendance is between .5% and 1%.  (Yes, you read that right, only 1 out of 100 at best.)  50 new churches are needed, but to say you want to do it is cause for raised eyebrows if not outright laughter.  At the same time, the audacity of that vision makes it compelling.  Do you have a vision?  Is it big enough to make people laugh?  If not, maybe it’s too small.

2. If you have a big vision make the big ask.
I was at the conference to speak – an honor – but I didn’t get away without being asked more than once by more than one person to help make the vision happen.  No hesitation.  No apology.  Just a straight up very specific and very big ask.  Just like the big vision was compelling the big ask was impossible to brush off.  Do you have a vision?  Do you know how and what to ask?  Are you doing it?

On my way to Europe

I have the amazing fortune of making two trips to Europe this spring.  Today, I am flying to Stockholm for the beginning of a 12 day trip with John Burke.  We’ll be in:

  • Stockholm
  • Helsinki
  • Tallin
  • Oslo
  • London

The full details are here.

If you’re interested enough to follow along, I’ll be posting updates in three places:

Theory of Change

I posted awhile back about essential ingredients. (will continue to)  I’ve been thinking about it at a deeper level – not just how do you develop leaders – how do people change?

So to get this topic started a couple questions to ponder:

  • Do you believe people can and do change?
  • If so, what are the factors the create real, lasting change in a person’s life?

comments are open.

Personal Lessons in Mastery

Reading Mastery challenged me to put the ideas to work in mastering something.  I have been dabbling and hacking away at physical fitness for about 12-18 months so it seemed a good place to start.  I peddle, paddle and run, but that’s not the dabbling part.  I’m not trying to master any of those things.  They are the means I’m currently using to master physical fitness.  Running has been the most challenging – here are some insights that I think have application to anything you choose to master.

1. Leave your ego at the door.
I run on the all-weather high school track which means I rarely run alone.  It’s one thing to get left in the dust by your 18 year old son who is 4 inches taller and ripped from head to toe.  Whole circle of life that’s my boy thing softens the blow to the ego.  When you get passed by some little girl that runs like a gazelle you have two choices either get off the track or leave your ego in the car.
2. Decide in advance.
I like peddling and paddling – part of why I include them in my fitness routine.  I’ve started calling my saturday morning 20+ mile peddle my sanity ride – it’s good for a lot more than just my fitness.  Running is another story.  I run because it stretches me physically and that’s the only reason I run.  Which means when your day starts at 5 am and its now 7 pm the couch looks a whole lot better than the track.  I don’t go to the track because I want to.  I go to the track because I decided I would.  I made that decision when I decided to master physical fitness.  Take that away and couch potato I am.
3. Silence the achiever.
I like to win.  The only way to win is to have some way to measure.  Peddle, paddle, run – that’s easy.  How far? How fast?  This voice out of nowhere screams in my head farther! faster!  I must daily tell it to shut up.  I’m not trying to win.  I’m going to master.  Farther faster is the road to dabbling.  Pace, rhythm, and even rest are the road to mastery.

It’s a Small World After All

Monday morning I talked with my daughter in who is going to school in Paris this year.

Tuesday afternoon I talked with my nephew and his family in Qingdao, China.  He recently started a consulting firm there to help people work effectively in a new cultural setting.
Wednesday I had a meeting to discuss training leaders who are starting house churches in 5 countries on 3 different continents.
Every one of these interactions was face to face using free online communication tools.
It  is still 24,901 miles around the earth at the equator, but Walt was right – it’s a small world after all, and getting smaller everyday.